|
|
NEWS BRIEFS Staff Senate reveals results of pay-period survey The Staff Senate received a report on the results of a survey that asked for staff members’ feelings about changing the pay period from monthly to bi-monthly status. Senator Peggy Braden, a secretary in the Department of Occupational Therapy, gave each senator a copy of the comments both for and against the proposal. She announced that 98 staff had voted to switch to bi-monthly pay, but by a narrow margin, 102 staff voted against the proposal. One of the chief concerns of the senate was whether bi-monthly paychecks could be direct deposited at local banks. The senate voted in favor of sending the results of the survey to Human Resources Director Steve Wood to gather more information about the possibility of bi-monthly pay before voting on the issue. In other business the senate: -Assigned the Scholarship Committee to gather information about endowment-level scholarships. -Agreed to look through the staff handbook and make recommendations on revisions. -Discussed the formation of a new
campus-wide Ecology Committee that will replace the Arboretum Committee. Faculty Senate discusses parking
concerns Dr. Gaylon Ross, a faculty member in the Department of Physics and Astronomy, told the senate that a faculty member in his college had asked the faculty senate to investigate the matter. According to Ross, one of his colleagues had been told by an unnamed source at the Physical Plant that none of the spaces were being designated as faculty/staff slots. The senate voted to assign the Faculty Affairs II Committee to investigate the issue and report back to the senate once more information had been gathered. The second item on the agenda was a request for a retraction in the February 7 issue of The Echo. According to Mary Mosley, a faculty member in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, several colleagues had approached her with concern about what The Echo had reported as a responsibility of the Academic Assessment Committee. Mosley said The Echo
incorrectly reported that the Academic Assessment Committee would be
"responsible for reviewing and approving all major changes in
curriculum." The senators discussed the probability that The Echo
reporter misinterpreted a portion of the responsibilities for the newly
formed committee. According to the outline one of the responsibilities
of the Academic Assessment Committee is to "review and approve all
major changes in assessment plans for existing programs." The
senate voted on a motion to request a retraction be printed in the next
issue of The Echo.
Scholarship money donated to College of Business
Seventeen UCA students were selected and honored at a reception on Thursday, Feb 16. They were later recognized at half-time of the UCA basketball game against Arkansas Tech. The 2002 UCA Who’s Who students are: |
||||||||||||||
|