Assessment Process Guide apg
University of Central Arkansas

Alternative Assessment Reporting Proposals

Proposals for alternative assessment reporting must include the following components:

  1. A detailed description of the assessment component within a given program's specialized accreditation regime. This may take the form of material quoted or copied from an accreditation handbook.
     
  2. A consideration of the relationship of that assessment component to university assessment needs, which include the following for each program:
     
    1. Stated learning goals/objectives for students in the program;
       
    2. Documentation/assessment of performance within the program in relation to those goals/objectives;
       
    3. Regular reporting of results and conclusions (scheduled, most likely, to coincide with the programs' schedules for existing program review); and
       
    4. Evidence of using assessment results and conclusions in program improvement.
       
  3. A recommendation about aligning the two obligations. This may simply entail an argument that the assessment component within a program's accreditation regime already fulfills the university's assessment needs. Any areas of apparent conflict between the two obligations should, of course, be explicitly addressed.

Academic Planning and Assessment
Office of the Provost
First published: March 2000

Return to top of page.

Disclaimer | PandA Home | E-mail

valid xhtml